From: mritchie@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Michael S Ritchie)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.masturbation
Subject: Re: j/o while wearing underware
Date: 20 Oct 1995 12:31:07 GMT
Organization: The Ohio State University
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <4684qb$632@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
References: <033302Z04101995@anon.penet.fi> <464mpa$132@sunburst.ccs.yorku.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: beauty.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu

In article <467cte$7jg@nyx10.cs.du.edu>,
Mr. Ixnay <ecriswel@nyx10.cs.du.edu> wrote:
>I typically always j/o while wearing underwear, pajamas, sweatpants, or
>long johns.  I've been sleeping in sweatpants or pajamas since around 1981
>and to me, it feels really good to wear something soft and comfortable like
>that to bed.  I get much more aroused by feeling myself through the
>sweatpants or pajamas than by trying it on the bare skin.  Are there any
>other people out there like this?

Yes.  For me, it seems to have to do with discovering the pleasures
of genital stimulation (even pre-masturbatory) while wearing
underwear when I was 9 or 10 years old.  When I actually realized
what was going on (and the potential for what *could* go on, i.e.,
full-fledged masturbation) and started actively playing wiht myself
around the age of 13, many of the first several orgasms I had were
dry ones, inside my underpants.  When I started making a mess,
I was torn about how to proceed:  keep doing it inside my underwear
then taking them off and sleeping nude, or doing it outside and
finding an easy and quiet way to clean up.  I wound up doing both.
To this day, I, like Mr. Ixnay, enjoy the stimulation of soft and
comfortable underwear sometimes.  And I'm especially happy to see
someone else post about long johns; I have fond memories of some
pairs of fleecy, thermal long johns that I wore and that a former
parter of mine wore during some long winter nights in my youth!

--
Michael Ritchie       |   "In cyberspace people are alone, pretending
ritchie.1@osu.edu     |     to be in public."
                               --Paul Goldberger (NYT, 10/5/95)