Rogue Review No. 448 - October 11, 1999
NOTICE: If you are easily offended, not of the
required legal age, or material of an erotic nature
is illegal where you are, then do not read what
follows.
TITLE: Pet
AUTHOR: Pami
LENGTH: 14,400 words
MAIN CHARACTER: Female
COMBINATION(S): Twosome (Female, Male)
ORIENTATION(S): Heterosexual (Female, Male)
RELATIONSHIP(S): Unmarried Couple
KINK(S): Dominance & Submission
Spanking
SETTING(S): Home
Store
GENRE(S): --
CAUTION(S): --
SUMMARY: A man and a woman, who have been corresponding via
the internet, finally meet in person for the first time.
She is smitten by him, but is only interested in him if it
is on her terms.
COMMENTARY: Wow! What a read! I can think of a number of
good things to say about this story. One, it is extremely
arousing. No question about it. Some of you may disagree,
if you don't care for a story in which the woman calls the
shots. That seems rather narrow minded to me, but to each
their own. Two, the author does a very nice job building up
the plot. There is sex, but not so much so that it
dominates the story. At the same time the story is
dominated by sexual tension. Did I just contradict myself?
Anyhow, three, I think the author does a superb job tossing
the point of view back and forth between the two characters.
The end result is that the reader feels as if they have
gotten to know both of the characters. I should mention
that "she" seemed a little more complete than "he" did;
possibly because the author gives a little more background
about "her" than she does about "him"; possibly because the
course the story takes seems to be more a fulfillment of
"her" fantasies than it is of "his". Which is not to say
that "he" doesn't enjoy "himself", just that it wasn't as
clear to me that the end result meant as much to "him" as it
did to "her". Well, I guess that about wraps it up. I was
very impressed by this story.
If I wanted to be nitpicky, then I might point out there
isn't much to the plot that does not directly involve their
relationship. In other words it seems to lack a backdrop to
put the story in perspective. Maybe this is asking too much
of erotic fiction? Anyhow, this missing element did not
interfere with my ability to enjoy this story. It is just
something that occurred to me as I was reflecting on the
story in a more analytic fashion.
OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS: 9.5 (out of 10)
- Arousal: 5/5
- Editing: 5/5
- Plot and Characters: 4/5
SUBJECTIVE ANALYSIS: Excellent
LINK(S): Pet
- http://www.deja.com/=gh/getdoc.xp?AN=412028772&fmt=raw [1/5]
- http://www.deja.com/=gh/getdoc.xp?AN=412028766&fmt=raw [2/5]
- http://www.deja.com/=gh/getdoc.xp?AN=413451282&fmt=raw [3/5]
- http://www.deja.com/=gh/getdoc.xp?AN=413451285&fmt=raw [4/5]
- http://www.deja.com/=gh/getdoc.xp?AN=420377242&fmt=raw [5/5]
- http://assm.asstr.org/erotica/assm/Year98/17192.txt [1/5]
- http://assm.asstr.org/erotica/assm/Year98/17191.txt [2/5]
- http://assm.asstr.org/erotica/assm/Year98/17293.txt [3/5]
- http://assm.asstr.org/erotica/assm/Year98/17294.txt [4/5]
- http://assm.asstr.org/erotica/assm/Year98/17904.txt [5/5]